cancel culture and 007

JAmes Bond 007 and cancel culture 007 bond is a movie that is founded on the premise that colonialism and racism is justified..... 007 is equivalent to a gothic barbarian trying to undermine the civil roman empire that genuinely grants true law order and peace in the world.. 007 was spawn out of the arrogant presumption that british had the pre ordain righ to govern the world while acclaiming other civilistions that exploit and conquer, unable or incapable to govern themselves. Movie amounts, rodents do our dirty work abroad" What is trully amazing in this PR culture, bond movie franchise have been able to remain undetected since the left right paradigm bandwagon in the western world has whitewashed and smeared the trully important things that need changing and adapting... No secret that many acclaim the us to continue the colonial pursuits of the old world and the ruling ellite are a result of the worldwide racial segregation of people around the world for its total benefit...so when their is a movie that sexes up a intelligence officer whose primary goal is to undermine and subvert nations for the benefit of its benefactor, trully affords to be categorized as a movie that should if left and right party alliances were reasonable, would agree that these movies predicate and promote the idea of a old colonial model and a system predicated on superiority and class. No one ever questions to consider why a 007 walks into which ever country to restore law and order as if these people tend to be corrupt and who cannot control their own affairs and issues... is an outdated movie that has no place in our modern day culture. meeting of aggressive expansion...of new world order.. sophisticated data building ... orwellian nightmare"--there are questions regarding this surveilance ..system .. 007 obsolete for a worldwide data system??? movie spectre still plays on the good guy 007 card.. as the surveilance system to replace him is a threat... and the movie blurrs the distinction between the british interests and this world conspiracy... and it needs to because the ellite are in fact creating a worldwide surveillance system as shown by snowden and assange.. so they need a adaptive script to make believe that britain is the saviour of the world despite clearly the movie clearly expressing the idea that information gathering is crucial and vague references to license to kill. The movie makers may have a good intent to inform people about the world, but it needs to assemble the politically correct actors thus skewing any good references or messages from the movie.. berhauser reveals that SPECTRE has funded the Joint Intelligence Service while staging terrorist attacks around the world, creating a need for the Nine Eyes programme beginning 007 had no authority... blow up a block in mexico city... what was he doing there?? security office tells 007. your officially grounded.

L Oreal PR Spin with Noble Price UN ambassador..

L Oreal new campaign is text book PR A black UN spokesman for human rights and ambassador to UN and noble award nominee... Here is a company enthusiastic to present an image of womans rights, philanthropy and exploiting the reward points of representing injustice and world welfare issues.. The problem is This is a company consumed with the idea of promoting superficial standards of womans beauty and whom do not inherently care for human rights issues.. but today marketing has to be sensitive to new political phenomenas particulaly metoo.... which ironically people like amber are an example of how a movement is exploited by automatically and feudalistically assigning woman an automatic victim in a circumstance.. But the image and rewards one receives to gain the perception that a company is in touch with the political issues of today and are sensitive to human rights issues is huge and wins loyal consumers to their products since the METOO# generation is now firmly incorporated in the psychy of woman's neurotic identity .which is closely aligned to political narrations and themes that spruik a new victim culture of entitlement and a climate where law is steered towards presumption of guilt feudal patriarchy politics that fully synthesis its worth with feminism....as the two partnerships reap record profits in the western world. by allowing a woman to claim AVO just on fear alone...which establishes source of fear and whether their is any... They also employ amber heard and it would have been a response to counter act potential fall outs from keeping amber on the books.. thus the company is not concerned by the inherent wrong in this since it does not translate into reward consumer points for their companies image and brand... People now cannot distinguish between marketing and real life and even though this concerted campaign is fake, paid and formulated to achieve profits , not a reward unto itself, the image and its reciprocal repetition in the media, drums down and cements into the emotional brain a validation of the products.. even though the perceptive and conscious spiritual faculties can see the hypocrisy, it does not register...---. it cloaks, conceals and insulates the brand and company from true expose of abuse, exploitation and hypocrisy of opting for politically correct movements and not endorse movements on the true metric and credibility of right versus wrong..metathesis.. popularity and accepted discourses is the football.. the arbiter is not predicated on the premise of a right or wrong paradigm in the ontological sense but to encapsulate the brand and connontate it as meeting the forefront and fashion of progressive decoy political movements that make people feel better about the true starving nations of the world when wearing makeup.... companies spend millions on advertisement with product and brand placement to induce and interrupt normal cultural paradigms and parameters so that they can find an indelible footprint and necessity within its gravity and sphere of influence... so too do these same companies , orchestrate fake grass roots movements with paid spectators and performers to communicate a fake message in the hope it will directly project into the emotional sphere brain that automatically associates brands and images with connontated feelings and emotions without it bypassing the rational faculty of the brain... the result of the perception and image that these cut outs dolls are real life people.... when real life people are the rentals to present and masquarade the idea that in order for you to be with the same worth , value and esteem as us.... you would too wear L Oreal what hypocrisy....

Tennis fame Dirty PR stages at Australian open

So tennis players do not always make good people... In recent events Mc Enroe used the opportunity to express disapproval for the margaret court and advocated openly to change the court to an aboriginal tennis player.. Mc Enroe obviously cananot separate politics from sport and is obviously advocating a sort of world where one certain belief is acceptable, this appeals to the bigoted, narrow minded cultural xenophobic person who has suddenly found a bandwagon and vehicle to disguise his intolerance and prejudice to people of different faiths and ideas.. This is no longer political but expresses a eschatalogical and ontological reality, beyond the point of materialistic politics. It shows how people can mask their real intentions and now win bonus brand points by reciting an acceptable, polarized political point of view that was invented in a marketing department . to shift cultural norms and taboos towards radical ideals that benefit corporate state power over the people.. though i will not get into how this is the case...this is mostly about Mc Enroe's antics.. His desire to impose his orbit and view of the world is shown when interviewing players after their tennis match, he centres his attention towards sports events around the world. it may be relevant at a press conference but not right after finishing a match where talk should be brief and quick , not set the person to a whole interview asking about various sports events around the world. what drives the interest in sport is not a spirit of athletic zeal but money and fame. These people are now icons and so they are very aware of what political movements can progress their career, their image or their brand.. they feel part of a privileged group of people and it is the last thing a person who is sponsored by banks, corporations and the grid to do, is to express what you actually believe as an individual , as a person that is beyond a sellable brand or commodity... A spokesman and ambassador has to conform to the politically correct ideals of the era... the materialistic mindset finds not benefit in sharing a personal interest or express a human rights issue that is too controverisial to mention, mostly because they perceive themselves as commodity bingers or walking advertisements who perform and act in the capacity they are meant to , otherwise their is no reason a company would allow a sportsman to receive insane amounts of money for simply playing a sport... this highly profile image is a bankable commodity, to position brand your product with a person with a image of success and recognition is the perfect placement.... players are bound by their corporate sponsors, they have no zeal for individualism and no integrity and even though many can rationalize that they could engage in more pressing concerns that are not dealt with during their career, the likelihood they would visit controversial areas is limited because they will always be in the spotlight Mc enroe enjoyed a privileged upbringing at a time where joining the professional circuit was as easy as a decision to make a transition from college to professional tennis... at a time with little competition, he was like unto an 19th century rich english man that had enough time and money to have a pass time and incidentally become good at the sport.. even though many do not have the opportunity to even begin to try making it the professional circuit... How can people of vice , profess a sort of self righteousness and moralizing about an issue, same sex is . the best way to gain an image of philanthropy while remaining attached to the hedonism and self justification of modern living of excess and vice... it is the perfect idiom to express to your constitutency that you are with it and so with that, the opportunity to belong to a club of acceptance , a club that mandates the arrogance that because they are famous because of some sport they did in the past, they inflate their worth by thinking people give a shit what they believe. He created a pre meditated public relations opportunity by protesting to reform margaret court arena into aboriginal name of a past tennis player ..perhaps mc enroe is jealous of margaret court success or how his bad ass was humilitated by the new monkeys coming out of the scene, such as sampras...never quite excelling and seeing his significance diminish with records continually broken since the time that he retired.. They now expect applause and adornment for the people for showing their urge for same sex justice to the world. materialists cannot separate their narcisstic image of themselves with their vcorporate brand and image... when george michael expected people to applaud and honour him for his decision to come out and deny the image that he conveyed in his last album, he hoped to skew the guilt and sin that he was living a lie about his identity and his interest and sort not to apologize but to construe it in a way that he was a victim of his own identity and others imposing a view on him.... despite him being the creator of this image that sold millions and created his name to the point of becoming a world recognised brand all over the world.... public relations conceals a lie to misalign to shift, to smear a personal truth in order to benefit commercially.... It is ironic that margaret court is worth not more than 1 million if you are to believe google.. when martina and billy jean are worth 20 times more... as to become a bankable brand and commodity, you have to get with it, or else in this industry, a person with personal convictions of faith and genuine belief is not bankable, sellable... everyone wants to sell out When in the circuit of fame, the process and filter of information does not meet a consensus, but the recriprocality of repeated images conveyed constantly on the media, through little things people do, build up their profile, image and brand... people irrationally develop a following for these people because they have a name of recognition and they were essentially promoted ... the process of mutual acceptance or a process of coming to like a star or person is not the process by which people become famous... it is a classic case of their corporations telling what the masses should like, as if it is a fashion and since they are a indellible and evasive part of our lives and our interactions, influencers are inextricably bound by their collective and we participate within this orbit chain of supply as consumers.... so when you understand the power of fame as a privileged class who are unordained initiatives but corporate creations to induce the masses, then one can understand the lace by which these sports stars are operating in... in understanding the foundation of the fame that they ingratiated in by being chosen as corporate stools, they have no sense of what the real people want or are in touch with reality but merely are in touch with the awareness of their ego their brand and the superficial decoy political events that are circulated like a commodity usually with the support of corporations . to distract people from real life issues that really matter... they inadvertedly do not understand that they are part of a circus act, muppet string show orchestrated by a public relations and marketing campaign above their own... but they know that this is the fodder that keeps them in the sync and they win points in the world they live in with signficiantly diverges from the real life issues that they do not want to be apart of because it does not win tax exempt status which gives them a media opportunity to present their brand as marketable and conducive to corporate business or to circulate corporatized commotized fake information for public disseminination--without their acceptance or their permission but becomes a living reality. so the famous are used to bypassing this recriprocality filter that the media invisibly conveys a consensus and acceptance and the people have to herald to accept and yield to the fashion and conformity of the times... through seduction and promotion, so a famous person , is here in the same capacity, bypassing the filter of the true people consensus and manipulating the media in a way that pushes his rendition of the narrative in a way that their is no debate, forum of engagement, no respect of belief, but saturation , conditioning and engineering... nico