Tennis fame Dirty PR stages at Australian open

So tennis players do not always make good people... In recent events Mc Enroe used the opportunity to express disapproval for the margaret court and advocated openly to change the court to an aboriginal tennis player.. Mc Enroe obviously cananot separate politics from sport and is obviously advocating a sort of world where one certain belief is acceptable, this appeals to the bigoted, narrow minded cultural xenophobic person who has suddenly found a bandwagon and vehicle to disguise his intolerance and prejudice to people of different faiths and ideas.. This is no longer political but expresses a eschatalogical and ontological reality, beyond the point of materialistic politics. It shows how people can mask their real intentions and now win bonus brand points by reciting an acceptable, polarized political point of view that was invented in a marketing department . to shift cultural norms and taboos towards radical ideals that benefit corporate state power over the people.. though i will not get into how this is the case...this is mostly about Mc Enroe's antics.. His desire to impose his orbit and view of the world is shown when interviewing players after their tennis match, he centres his attention towards sports events around the world. it may be relevant at a press conference but not right after finishing a match where talk should be brief and quick , not set the person to a whole interview asking about various sports events around the world. what drives the interest in sport is not a spirit of athletic zeal but money and fame. These people are now icons and so they are very aware of what political movements can progress their career, their image or their brand.. they feel part of a privileged group of people and it is the last thing a person who is sponsored by banks, corporations and the grid to do, is to express what you actually believe as an individual , as a person that is beyond a sellable brand or commodity... A spokesman and ambassador has to conform to the politically correct ideals of the era... the materialistic mindset finds not benefit in sharing a personal interest or express a human rights issue that is too controverisial to mention, mostly because they perceive themselves as commodity bingers or walking advertisements who perform and act in the capacity they are meant to , otherwise their is no reason a company would allow a sportsman to receive insane amounts of money for simply playing a sport... this highly profile image is a bankable commodity, to position brand your product with a person with a image of success and recognition is the perfect placement.... players are bound by their corporate sponsors, they have no zeal for individualism and no integrity and even though many can rationalize that they could engage in more pressing concerns that are not dealt with during their career, the likelihood they would visit controversial areas is limited because they will always be in the spotlight Mc enroe enjoyed a privileged upbringing at a time where joining the professional circuit was as easy as a decision to make a transition from college to professional tennis... at a time with little competition, he was like unto an 19th century rich english man that had enough time and money to have a pass time and incidentally become good at the sport.. even though many do not have the opportunity to even begin to try making it the professional circuit... How can people of vice , profess a sort of self righteousness and moralizing about an issue, same sex is . the best way to gain an image of philanthropy while remaining attached to the hedonism and self justification of modern living of excess and vice... it is the perfect idiom to express to your constitutency that you are with it and so with that, the opportunity to belong to a club of acceptance , a club that mandates the arrogance that because they are famous because of some sport they did in the past, they inflate their worth by thinking people give a shit what they believe. He created a pre meditated public relations opportunity by protesting to reform margaret court arena into aboriginal name of a past tennis player ..perhaps mc enroe is jealous of margaret court success or how his bad ass was humilitated by the new monkeys coming out of the scene, such as sampras...never quite excelling and seeing his significance diminish with records continually broken since the time that he retired.. They now expect applause and adornment for the people for showing their urge for same sex justice to the world. materialists cannot separate their narcisstic image of themselves with their vcorporate brand and image... when george michael expected people to applaud and honour him for his decision to come out and deny the image that he conveyed in his last album, he hoped to skew the guilt and sin that he was living a lie about his identity and his interest and sort not to apologize but to construe it in a way that he was a victim of his own identity and others imposing a view on him.... despite him being the creator of this image that sold millions and created his name to the point of becoming a world recognised brand all over the world.... public relations conceals a lie to misalign to shift, to smear a personal truth in order to benefit commercially.... It is ironic that margaret court is worth not more than 1 million if you are to believe google.. when martina and billy jean are worth 20 times more... as to become a bankable brand and commodity, you have to get with it, or else in this industry, a person with personal convictions of faith and genuine belief is not bankable, sellable... everyone wants to sell out When in the circuit of fame, the process and filter of information does not meet a consensus, but the recriprocality of repeated images conveyed constantly on the media, through little things people do, build up their profile, image and brand... people irrationally develop a following for these people because they have a name of recognition and they were essentially promoted ... the process of mutual acceptance or a process of coming to like a star or person is not the process by which people become famous... it is a classic case of their corporations telling what the masses should like, as if it is a fashion and since they are a indellible and evasive part of our lives and our interactions, influencers are inextricably bound by their collective and we participate within this orbit chain of supply as consumers.... so when you understand the power of fame as a privileged class who are unordained initiatives but corporate creations to induce the masses, then one can understand the lace by which these sports stars are operating in... in understanding the foundation of the fame that they ingratiated in by being chosen as corporate stools, they have no sense of what the real people want or are in touch with reality but merely are in touch with the awareness of their ego their brand and the superficial decoy political events that are circulated like a commodity usually with the support of corporations . to distract people from real life issues that really matter... they inadvertedly do not understand that they are part of a circus act, muppet string show orchestrated by a public relations and marketing campaign above their own... but they know that this is the fodder that keeps them in the sync and they win points in the world they live in with signficiantly diverges from the real life issues that they do not want to be apart of because it does not win tax exempt status which gives them a media opportunity to present their brand as marketable and conducive to corporate business or to circulate corporatized commotized fake information for public disseminination--without their acceptance or their permission but becomes a living reality. so the famous are used to bypassing this recriprocality filter that the media invisibly conveys a consensus and acceptance and the people have to herald to accept and yield to the fashion and conformity of the times... through seduction and promotion, so a famous person , is here in the same capacity, bypassing the filter of the true people consensus and manipulating the media in a way that pushes his rendition of the narrative in a way that their is no debate, forum of engagement, no respect of belief, but saturation , conditioning and engineering... nico