I know what you did last summer 2025

Hello again .. Let me critique the new movie I know what you did Last Summer 2025.... We have the Twists, a creative reinterpretation around the mystery and identity of the killer...We have Nostolgia from the legacy characters who are consistently interwoven through the plot of the movie.. I remember a neighbour told me that the film was shooting at the next doors neighbour and I went out at night looming and foraging a little bit of mystery, a bit of teen adventure...I let off my guaard too soon , asking whether jennifer love hewitt was. there and I Was armed with her CD I wanted her to sign... I Recall walking around and was self conscious about it ... but I should have stayed, I walked straight past the director, as I saw she was a little nervous.. I regret not saying anything... I was a meter away... I took my own footage.. The movie does not disappoint. The movie employed many decoys as the movie stretched towards the end.... and I think that the choose for the killer was fitting and made the film more fun and entertaining... there was an element where the franchise stood up and made the bold statement they were Brand Icons of a town that is trying to delete the main characters away... So in our lives they want to erase the individual fo the sprawling mass commercial construction... the hunt for the identity...belonging to your community...perhaps..you can take this message... I loved the choice of scenes , nice little corners of a fisherman;s boat, a fisherman chanty .... created the backdrop of Romance... i would have loved to see a love scene from jennifer and fred, but the engagement of their characters in the film does not disappoint... they got a lot of time in the movie... I tried to identify locations in sydney. and only saw paddington and watsons bay.. the church looks like the one in la parouse in sydney which is on the opposite pennisula of watsons bay in sydney... I really warmed up when I saw freddy behind the bar... just like the character in previous films... wouldnt you like to have been freddy meeting a hot girl like jennifer in a small town and then be part of a mystery.. however I would not want to be killed... but we are safe as audience watchers...imagining as teens to the stories we had when we went out for adventure and I Recall la perouse with friends in national park... we thought to leave and just in time and just about the right timely decision cause a bunch of cars came out of there, who knows what they were.... I Recall walking the nightly lane ways in sydney knowing as my neighbour informed me that they were filing on a particular night... and there a garage was lent to the movie production.. i was disappointed that i could not recollect the use of the neighbours house in any form or fashion.. perhaps they re did the scene in los angelos as jennifer love hewitt delayed making a decision and thereffore , the director may had to change or redirect scenes.. so happy to see plenty of freddie and jenniers character and then a third twist that wants to introduce a sequel ... and also there may be more than 2 killers... and this was important for a twist and a more deeper darker explanation... the ending was fantastic and does not disappoint.. Reviewers were disappointed at identity of killer and teens acting as teens and i saw nothing in to script that contradicted the theme of the movie... and when madaline's character says she is hungry at the end.. yes ... who wouldn't be... cause in real life, if your life was threatened you would lose your appetite.. the last night of screeening at the ritz.... with only one other person, my brothers did not come.... 7/10

cancel culture and 007

JAmes Bond 007 and cancel culture 007 bond is a movie that is founded on the premise that colonialism and racism is justified..... 007 is equivalent to a gothic barbarian trying to undermine the civil roman empire that genuinely grants true law order and peace in the world.. 007 was spawn out of the arrogant presumption that british had the pre ordain righ to govern the world while acclaiming other civilistions that exploit and conquer, unable or incapable to govern themselves. Movie amounts, rodents do our dirty work abroad" What is trully amazing in this PR culture, bond movie franchise have been able to remain undetected since the left right paradigm bandwagon in the western world has whitewashed and smeared the trully important things that need changing and adapting... No secret that many acclaim the us to continue the colonial pursuits of the old world and the ruling ellite are a result of the worldwide racial segregation of people around the world for its total benefit...so when their is a movie that sexes up a intelligence officer whose primary goal is to undermine and subvert nations for the benefit of its benefactor, trully affords to be categorized as a movie that should if left and right party alliances were reasonable, would agree that these movies predicate and promote the idea of a old colonial model and a system predicated on superiority and class. No one ever questions to consider why a 007 walks into which ever country to restore law and order as if these people tend to be corrupt and who cannot control their own affairs and issues... is an outdated movie that has no place in our modern day culture. meeting of aggressive expansion...of new world order.. sophisticated data building ... orwellian nightmare"--there are questions regarding this surveilance ..system .. 007 obsolete for a worldwide data system??? movie spectre still plays on the good guy 007 card.. as the surveilance system to replace him is a threat... and the movie blurrs the distinction between the british interests and this world conspiracy... and it needs to because the ellite are in fact creating a worldwide surveillance system as shown by snowden and assange.. so they need a adaptive script to make believe that britain is the saviour of the world despite clearly the movie clearly expressing the idea that information gathering is crucial and vague references to license to kill. The movie makers may have a good intent to inform people about the world, but it needs to assemble the politically correct actors thus skewing any good references or messages from the movie.. berhauser reveals that SPECTRE has funded the Joint Intelligence Service while staging terrorist attacks around the world, creating a need for the Nine Eyes programme beginning 007 had no authority... blow up a block in mexico city... what was he doing there?? security office tells 007. your officially grounded.

L Oreal PR Spin with Noble Price UN ambassador..

L Oreal new campaign is text book PR A black UN spokesman for human rights and ambassador to UN and noble award nominee... Here is a company enthusiastic to present an image of womans rights, philanthropy and exploiting the reward points of representing injustice and world welfare issues.. The problem is This is a company consumed with the idea of promoting superficial standards of womans beauty and whom do not inherently care for human rights issues.. but today marketing has to be sensitive to new political phenomenas particulaly metoo.... which ironically people like amber are an example of how a movement is exploited by automatically and feudalistically assigning woman an automatic victim in a circumstance.. But the image and rewards one receives to gain the perception that a company is in touch with the political issues of today and are sensitive to human rights issues is huge and wins loyal consumers to their products since the METOO# generation is now firmly incorporated in the psychy of woman's neurotic identity .which is closely aligned to political narrations and themes that spruik a new victim culture of entitlement and a climate where law is steered towards presumption of guilt feudal patriarchy politics that fully synthesis its worth with feminism....as the two partnerships reap record profits in the western world. by allowing a woman to claim AVO just on fear alone...which establishes source of fear and whether their is any... They also employ amber heard and it would have been a response to counter act potential fall outs from keeping amber on the books.. thus the company is not concerned by the inherent wrong in this since it does not translate into reward consumer points for their companies image and brand... People now cannot distinguish between marketing and real life and even though this concerted campaign is fake, paid and formulated to achieve profits , not a reward unto itself, the image and its reciprocal repetition in the media, drums down and cements into the emotional brain a validation of the products.. even though the perceptive and conscious spiritual faculties can see the hypocrisy, it does not register...---. it cloaks, conceals and insulates the brand and company from true expose of abuse, exploitation and hypocrisy of opting for politically correct movements and not endorse movements on the true metric and credibility of right versus wrong..metathesis.. popularity and accepted discourses is the football.. the arbiter is not predicated on the premise of a right or wrong paradigm in the ontological sense but to encapsulate the brand and connontate it as meeting the forefront and fashion of progressive decoy political movements that make people feel better about the true starving nations of the world when wearing makeup.... companies spend millions on advertisement with product and brand placement to induce and interrupt normal cultural paradigms and parameters so that they can find an indelible footprint and necessity within its gravity and sphere of influence... so too do these same companies , orchestrate fake grass roots movements with paid spectators and performers to communicate a fake message in the hope it will directly project into the emotional sphere brain that automatically associates brands and images with connontated feelings and emotions without it bypassing the rational faculty of the brain... the result of the perception and image that these cut outs dolls are real life people.... when real life people are the rentals to present and masquarade the idea that in order for you to be with the same worth , value and esteem as us.... you would too wear L Oreal what hypocrisy....

Tennis fame Dirty PR stages at Australian open

So tennis players do not always make good people... In recent events Mc Enroe used the opportunity to express disapproval for the margaret court and advocated openly to change the court to an aboriginal tennis player.. Mc Enroe obviously cananot separate politics from sport and is obviously advocating a sort of world where one certain belief is acceptable, this appeals to the bigoted, narrow minded cultural xenophobic person who has suddenly found a bandwagon and vehicle to disguise his intolerance and prejudice to people of different faiths and ideas.. This is no longer political but expresses a eschatalogical and ontological reality, beyond the point of materialistic politics. It shows how people can mask their real intentions and now win bonus brand points by reciting an acceptable, polarized political point of view that was invented in a marketing department . to shift cultural norms and taboos towards radical ideals that benefit corporate state power over the people.. though i will not get into how this is the case...this is mostly about Mc Enroe's antics.. His desire to impose his orbit and view of the world is shown when interviewing players after their tennis match, he centres his attention towards sports events around the world. it may be relevant at a press conference but not right after finishing a match where talk should be brief and quick , not set the person to a whole interview asking about various sports events around the world. what drives the interest in sport is not a spirit of athletic zeal but money and fame. These people are now icons and so they are very aware of what political movements can progress their career, their image or their brand.. they feel part of a privileged group of people and it is the last thing a person who is sponsored by banks, corporations and the grid to do, is to express what you actually believe as an individual , as a person that is beyond a sellable brand or commodity... A spokesman and ambassador has to conform to the politically correct ideals of the era... the materialistic mindset finds not benefit in sharing a personal interest or express a human rights issue that is too controverisial to mention, mostly because they perceive themselves as commodity bingers or walking advertisements who perform and act in the capacity they are meant to , otherwise their is no reason a company would allow a sportsman to receive insane amounts of money for simply playing a sport... this highly profile image is a bankable commodity, to position brand your product with a person with a image of success and recognition is the perfect placement.... players are bound by their corporate sponsors, they have no zeal for individualism and no integrity and even though many can rationalize that they could engage in more pressing concerns that are not dealt with during their career, the likelihood they would visit controversial areas is limited because they will always be in the spotlight Mc enroe enjoyed a privileged upbringing at a time where joining the professional circuit was as easy as a decision to make a transition from college to professional tennis... at a time with little competition, he was like unto an 19th century rich english man that had enough time and money to have a pass time and incidentally become good at the sport.. even though many do not have the opportunity to even begin to try making it the professional circuit... How can people of vice , profess a sort of self righteousness and moralizing about an issue, same sex is . the best way to gain an image of philanthropy while remaining attached to the hedonism and self justification of modern living of excess and vice... it is the perfect idiom to express to your constitutency that you are with it and so with that, the opportunity to belong to a club of acceptance , a club that mandates the arrogance that because they are famous because of some sport they did in the past, they inflate their worth by thinking people give a shit what they believe. He created a pre meditated public relations opportunity by protesting to reform margaret court arena into aboriginal name of a past tennis player ..perhaps mc enroe is jealous of margaret court success or how his bad ass was humilitated by the new monkeys coming out of the scene, such as sampras...never quite excelling and seeing his significance diminish with records continually broken since the time that he retired.. They now expect applause and adornment for the people for showing their urge for same sex justice to the world. materialists cannot separate their narcisstic image of themselves with their vcorporate brand and image... when george michael expected people to applaud and honour him for his decision to come out and deny the image that he conveyed in his last album, he hoped to skew the guilt and sin that he was living a lie about his identity and his interest and sort not to apologize but to construe it in a way that he was a victim of his own identity and others imposing a view on him.... despite him being the creator of this image that sold millions and created his name to the point of becoming a world recognised brand all over the world.... public relations conceals a lie to misalign to shift, to smear a personal truth in order to benefit commercially.... It is ironic that margaret court is worth not more than 1 million if you are to believe google.. when martina and billy jean are worth 20 times more... as to become a bankable brand and commodity, you have to get with it, or else in this industry, a person with personal convictions of faith and genuine belief is not bankable, sellable... everyone wants to sell out When in the circuit of fame, the process and filter of information does not meet a consensus, but the recriprocality of repeated images conveyed constantly on the media, through little things people do, build up their profile, image and brand... people irrationally develop a following for these people because they have a name of recognition and they were essentially promoted ... the process of mutual acceptance or a process of coming to like a star or person is not the process by which people become famous... it is a classic case of their corporations telling what the masses should like, as if it is a fashion and since they are a indellible and evasive part of our lives and our interactions, influencers are inextricably bound by their collective and we participate within this orbit chain of supply as consumers.... so when you understand the power of fame as a privileged class who are unordained initiatives but corporate creations to induce the masses, then one can understand the lace by which these sports stars are operating in... in understanding the foundation of the fame that they ingratiated in by being chosen as corporate stools, they have no sense of what the real people want or are in touch with reality but merely are in touch with the awareness of their ego their brand and the superficial decoy political events that are circulated like a commodity usually with the support of corporations . to distract people from real life issues that really matter... they inadvertedly do not understand that they are part of a circus act, muppet string show orchestrated by a public relations and marketing campaign above their own... but they know that this is the fodder that keeps them in the sync and they win points in the world they live in with signficiantly diverges from the real life issues that they do not want to be apart of because it does not win tax exempt status which gives them a media opportunity to present their brand as marketable and conducive to corporate business or to circulate corporatized commotized fake information for public disseminination--without their acceptance or their permission but becomes a living reality. so the famous are used to bypassing this recriprocality filter that the media invisibly conveys a consensus and acceptance and the people have to herald to accept and yield to the fashion and conformity of the times... through seduction and promotion, so a famous person , is here in the same capacity, bypassing the filter of the true people consensus and manipulating the media in a way that pushes his rendition of the narrative in a way that their is no debate, forum of engagement, no respect of belief, but saturation , conditioning and engineering... nico

Real Culture and Consumer Culture

What world we live in.. Regional custom culture and tradition has now been displaced with a commercial culture where the protagonists have optimized the efficiency of this phenomena and machine simply by the use of the media and with commercials. One has to wonder why the propensity and tendency for people to be seduced and influenced by cultural icons, cultural commercials phenomenas is linked to their inherent lack of identity and deprivation of actual real culture that was ordained once and for all.. and they seek to fulfill that empty space by fulfilling a consumer driven action and urge that inherently does not satisfy. When one learns about the dynamic of how these systems are organized and influence people with herd mentality and with the missing out factor", one can glean why corporations and brands understand that when people live hollow, shallow lives and who are removed from their cultural roots and identity, then the fake cultural icons they produce are more accepted and more successful and are able to penetrate that barrier by which a person of little benown, becomes a close and confided friend of whom you would buy a ticket to their concert, all because their image was circulated on the media.. and all because they were promoted and circulated as new religious icons which we should pay homage to. you may be enticed in order to conform to a group think and this phenomena is linked with a larger group where individual thinking and creativity is replaced for consumer driven ideas and events that dilute the image of our real identity and what we really enjoy and like to do with out spare time that would gratify us and make us happy. Mostly these commercial brand phenomenas are driven by a missing out factor where people are driven to the ideals of fashion, trends where statually economically and now culturally, one is acting to do what progressive life expects them to to undertake. In other words, people are now happy to be consumers and not producers of content and events, rather people are conditioned to associate their happiness and well being by partaking in other peoples productions at exorbitant prices because their lives are deprived of narrative, content, cultural connection meaning and purpose which tradition, custom gave us in the beginning. It is in our innate natural desire to want to watch theatricals and be entertained and no doubt this is blameless in our constitution, but the level by which these platforms are being pushed up into our cultural orbit and sphere is unhealthy and un natural and reduce us not to participators or people who enjoy creative arts and music etc but as shire consumers who are expected to behave predictably like consumers. not for the sake of participating in productions that elevate, inspire and motive us as humans but merely to facilitate a social need of conforming to the status quo.. To many it may seem insane that people would buy a product simply because they paid a major star to pitch the product but this money is not wasted for no reason...People's new world is struck into the fantasy where media celebrities and stars seem to have a relationship with us... we have feelings, ideas and experiences about this person that mirror very closely to experiences we would have if we had known that person in real life .. we rationalize that we know this person and their music and art they make and in some cases we can make assessments about their character, persuasions etc... but we still do not know them, but we think we do.. and so we therefore facilitate the need to build relationships with people we do not know because our own cultural reality and orbit is deprived of real role models, friends and relationships that positively identify us in our natural cultural space of engagement. They now can build associations in 3D life we everyday regular objects we buy and consume everyday where this stars influence in pitching a certain lifestyle or product seal a certain amount of validation to these products as if these stars naturally decided to buy and endorse these products on their own free will and volition without being paid off. The associations of glamour, rarity, specialiness, validation , sense of belonging, sense of feeling good, etc are 3D brnad placement goals to replace all those cultural and religious norms of a normal society into the phenomena of a commercial society... it is deliberate. It is tied up to a religious psychological fantasy where by a person is merely overcome by the mere fact that this person is famous like a demi god, because this person is not exactly appreciated for his work or art in an objective fashion.. marketing phenomenas cannot just work n this morbid principle of people recognition, the feelings are unmistakenably religious.. marketing needs you to irrationally idolize this person simply because they are famous and then what they do and what they drink becomes so intricately special to you.. so they are religious leader and cultural leaders of our generation...it is attracting that part of our constitution faculties and make up of our human constitution that idolizing idols to the extent of almost worshipping.. Brand placement with advertising and movies is so strong and pervasive in our culture that we blur the lines between fiction and fantasy in our lives.. we cannot separate the idea that these people are merely entertainers who's image only became known to us from a device that reproduces and duplicates image of a mass scale level and seek to condition us to associate ideas, attitudes and feelings just by their identity or the image they are promoted in... they are celebrated like in a church of icons and are the cultural validators of the consumer experience of a whole conveyorbelt of items that they choose to endorse and placate our loyalities to. it is stemmed in materialism and money and these people are seen as highly successful and therefore well adjusted people and we are moved when we see them more for what feelings they conjure in us... it is the a raw primal power of celebrity, lights that is unmistakenably religious in nature. This is where it becomes unreasonable and disturbing. In a society where their are no role models where notions of community have been demolished, where the right to organise your own parties and create experiences has been made illegal because corporations want to be the narrators of those parties , the creators of your cultural icons and the owners of your experience.. so that you are pre disposed to buying and consuming in the experiences they promote when all they are are products like canned soup.. The space by which one makes their own entertainment is now perceived as devoid of fame and notoriety. That space is reserved for the commercial sphere to organise corporations are the sole purveyors of culture... Many well to do people may visit greece on the proviso that the country is a circus or a playground for their own personal indulgence... They narrate their own self worth and identity merely because they are products of purchase to a corporation who produced a identity, image or phenomena as a vehicle to push new products.. They can complain about a donkey who is carrying too much of a load , while horses and animals throughout the world are killed on a consistent commercial basis for the maximum derivation of profit... We live in a world that perceives information and items as commodities to be exploited for the sake of profit, while the raw data of truth is distorted, smeared and exploited in order to seduce and caricature a certain desired image or identity in order to duplicate and sell products. when someone has a strong sense of their own cultural identity stemmed from their history, nationhood and culture and also from their own individuality and own destiny where they can produce ,create in real life then one is no longer influenced by these fake commercial products and phenomenas that constantly leave us in a state of anxiety and poor so to keep up with the latest trends and actions we have to keep up with in life...They all vy for a space in our mind and reduce our individuality to consumer dependence and conformity. Their are movements in marketing that want to nurture the fact of villification that promotes the idea of rejection alienation of people who do not accept their products as people are living without milk, shelter or subsistence things and then as castigated as the bad people .... if you did not have an iphone, most certainly you would be singled out.. it would at least appear as unusual and eccentric and yet because of the barometer of cultural change they narrate, it appears from the onset as crazy to not own one.... When people are divided and never unite they make profitable units for television ratings who maximise the exposure of their advertising dollar in the capacity of consumers not participators.... we are constantly messaged about how we should act, what we should buy and what we should be doing....... Nicholas Lazarou

How Ironic

How ironic that people are educated about how marketing works through this program and yet cannot see how institutions like the human rights commission use marketing as a ploy to create fake grass roots movements and create cultural taboos discourses, cliches and narratives that condition people to view with distorted filter lense .... the arbitrary wholesale and stigmatization of the human experience into narrow diluted spectrums in order to convey the perception and the impression that the civil right to vent, express and disagree can be rebranded and remarketed and re engineered as sexual harrassment.. the fact that the human rights commission did not make a specific choice in the questionaire and provide clear definable alternative pathway in the marketing survey, essentially, allowed them to hoard up all complex human experiences & categorized them between two polarities worthy of a cheap english tabloid 1 sexual harrassment 2 no sexual harrassment. . so effectively in marketing circles.. surveys and the use of science or pseudo science can be used as a validator and influencer to make credible their observations and assessments in order to meet their marketing strategic objective. with the support of their image as infallible priests of philanthropy in the temple of capitalism.

ADVERTISING SUBSIDISES DEMOCRACY

Gruen Transfer So4E01 from 24 minutes in . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1bzAhy7indI It started well Advertising is the cancer of democracy... and then the panel guest reasserts that the real cancer of democracy is the inability to communicate. advertising does not solve anything but what it can be is communicate". Advertising does not have to be evil, but generally the nature of the industry is to pulp up the benefits of a product and create imagery that evokes an emotion in you that wants to place the brand in your life. Advertising in the political and information realm does more than communication it distorts reappropriates redefines , segregates and narrates a more appeasable and political correct rendition of the truth.. Here the panel are debating about the value of advertising in our society.. Here is the test to showcase what their real sediments are and exposes how the Gruens Transfer is not about educating people about how advertising works to seduce your irrational senses , but a phenomena that understands perfectly well its place in relation to the powers and the elite. Mining companies campaigns." u can call press conference and press release and rely on media... or get your media money and spend millions and spend millions of dollars getting the public to see your point of view"... Here is where the episode gets sinister and exposes the dark side of advertising. ADVERTISING SUBSIDISES DEMOCRACY.....HE SAID IT!! HORSES MOUTH.He forgot to put a filter.... to prove a point. ... he continues.!!!! The money spent in media via advertising the wealthier the media companies are and wealthier they feel the more journalists they can employ and the more journalists they employ the more they would scrutinise whats going on in government." This is his public relations hat or attempt to side wash or white wash the previous point he made about how advertising will ensure companies can push their point of view against media..point of view... and then contradicts himself with the above statement So the first point was about utilising advertising and marketing to prevent the media from telling the story how it is and then finds a cheesy conduit to justify this expenditure in advertising to cover up mining company sins and dirty business by stating that this money that is contributed will in turn be given to media companies to employ more journalists to scrutinise the government. The thread and conduit of flimsy justification is an attempt to portray the ends justifies the means..he does not make a distinction between government or mining... he will take their money for advertising. so evil justifies good and they both need eachother to exist . a vice is necessary for a virtue... an advertisers mind trying to haughtily place advertising as an idol of worship in the holy temple of capitalism. So to get it straight he resounds the idea that big corporations or the government can employ advertising to dictate and dominate the discourse and dissemination of information in the media to cement their point of view which is usually to hide their bad record of polluting the environment etc. and use advertising to effect a lie against a truth and then that money made can then serve democracy by employing journalists to uncover what the government is doing... the level of contradiction is demonic since journalists role is to perform the edicts of the editor who ensures content is politically correct and enterprisingly acceptable and submissible content for the stakeholders. so he lies on both counts and stretches out this lie to such an extent that he refashions virtue for vice and vice for virtue. He placed advertising industry as a important organ for the operation of the democratic process and completely ignores the un naturalness of this system and how the lack of people power and their ability to influence government has allowed for a vacuum and market for the advertising to fill... the void of the democracy glut where corporations are . the willing volunteers to replace the people as the imprint and organ and transmitter or as the panel man called it.. the subsidizer of democracy. This reminds me of politicians who had done bad or gained a bad reputation or corporations for that matter and then officially use the media to show their good deeds to charity in order, not to help with inequality and . welfare issues, but to fix their image in the eyes of the media as they are very aware how image and brand work for the career prospects of the candidate. The guy who is anti capitalism with the red shirt is genuinely perturbed by this powerhouse heavy weight advertiser... and states facts and advertising hold uncomfortable relationship with eachother. ADVERTISING IS DEEPLY HONEST"> WAN..ER> He is the arrogance of a people that believe the place of advertising is natural and necessary, similiar to banks claim that they ensure the health of the economy....or like warlords owning fiefs ensure the spiritual welfare of their human cattle who are in misery but they will ensure their salvation. "It is the seasame street of capitalism." as one panel guest rebuts. you have to have a thriving advertising industry Nicholas Lazarou business marketing degree